AMD And Intel Processor Comparison Information Technology Essay

AMD processors offer three ranges – high end, middle and end basis. There are three processors each category. Category consists of high end AMD Phenom II X6, AMD Phenom X4 and AMD Phenom II x2 II. Phenom II X6 is the first six-core AMD processors are intended for the optimum level of performance and very high. Phenom X4 II is equipped with quad-core Phenom chips and chip-II X6 is specifically designed for the very unusual use of quality multimedia and advanced applications.Phenom X2 II 2 core processor is the capacity to ensure high performance is good overall with a very economical price. Category consists of mid-end AMD Phenom X3 II, II, and AMD Turion AMD Turion Ultra II. II Phenom X3 is a customer of class 3 core processors with 64-bit computing capabilities, designed to provide optimum performance with economy pricing. Both Turions multimedia products designed for the perfect and most of them come with an AMD or ATI graphics, of course, at a very economical price. AMD is the AMD Sempron basis, AMD Athlon and AMD Athlon X2 Neo Neo. Considered best for mobile computing, AMD Sempron is a popular choice for low budget desktop and laptop. The processor is suitable for very basic computing needs such as browsing the Internet, the basic functions of the office and e-mail. Neo Neo Athlon and Athlon X2 comes with a lower processing power and economic strength of customers and most are found in netbook and nettop. Because the integrated ATI graphics, the processor also offers basic feasible multimedia output.

Intel Processors

Not to be outdone by AMD, Intel is a serious competitor when it comes to Intel and AMD processor comparison. Similar to AMD, Intel also offers a range of three processors – the high end, mid end and the base – the first category consists of three and the rest consists of two products. High-end consists of the latest series of Intel Core processors i – Intel Core i3, i5, and i7. Core and Core i7 i5 comes with 2, 4 or 6 (there is only the Core i7) and the ability of 64-bit processors. Both come with Hyper Threading technology and Turbo Boost. Turbo Boost technology ensures increased overall performance and handling aspect as the number of active cores, power consumption, processor temperature, etc. Core i3 also has this feature, except Turbo Boost technology. Core i5 has a cache memory is lower than the i7. Mid-end range includes Intel Core 2 Duo and Intel Pentium Dual Core processor. The former offers two core processes that improve the gaming and multimedia output. This last is based on Core micro-architecture and a decent multimedia output. Basic Intel processors, including Intel Centrino, Intel Centrino Duo and Intel Atom.

>Power Consumption

When we look to overall power consumption of a system, Intel definitely suffered the early downfall . Its Pentium 4 processors had a very bad reputation of 150W TDP. Intel tried to solve the problem in its Intel i7 960 processor, which goes to less than 95W TDP. But, experiments have still proved that a machine running on an Intel i7 960 processor consumed, at least 7W more power, than an AMD Sempron . But in today AMD to produce a new product, “AMD Phenom X4 II. ” Product in product far greater to AMD products before, This Power Consumption 125 watt AMD can give than the Intel Core i7 , that only 95 .Its too big different if you compare whether product by AMD and Intel.

>Price vs. Performance

When it comes to the performance to cost ratio, AMD has definitely been the winner, for a long time. Its processors were cheaper, as compared to Intel and they definitely did provide high value performance. But, with the advent of the Intel’s Quadcore and Intel Core i7 processor, the situation has totally changed. The performance of a Intel Core i7 processor is, perhaps, the best in the market and its price is continuously falling.

>3D Gaming

This is basically the feature that had allowed AMD to hold its top position for a long time. Even with no graphics card, AMD’s 64 bit processor could take on the load and support the gaming features of advanced games. Intel, however, suffered an initial setback because the multithreading features that it allowed, were not used by many games then. The AMD Phenom II X4 bit could beat the Pentium 4 computers, in almost all respects, when it came to gaming. But, the turnover again, happened with the introduction of the Intel i7 960 processor processors. The scenario changed completely. Besides the equivalent features that these two processors could provide (when compared to the AMD Phenom II X4 ), they also had an added feature of supporting dual video cards.

>Graphics

The comparison would again be the same, as that of the 3D gaming. AMD is a winner when its processors are compared to Intel’s previous processors, but “AMD Phenom X4 II. ” processors, with their supreme features, have helped Intel re gain the share of the market that it deserves.

>MP3 and Video Encoding

AMD’s 64 bit processors provided faster encoding of MP3s, as well as videos. The reason is simple – a 64 bit processor will, of course, be faster than a 32 bit processor. Intel’s 32 bit processors had higher clock frequencies, but while the clock frequency of a 64 bit processor could be less, it worked at almost twice the speed than what was mentioned in its manual. This feature was also combated by Intel with its AMD Phenom X4 IIprocessors. If we do not run experiments to test the minutest details, then both the companies can provide good encoding capability for any average user.

>Cooling and Productivity

Computers working on Intel i7 960 processors definitely have superior cooling features and better heat sinks, when compared to the AMD machines. Not only this, but the Intel i7 960 could reach to a speed of 3.2 GHz on proper cooling.

>Office Productivity and Multitasking

Finally, we come down to the basic features, that every computer user is worried about – the level of office productivity, internet browsing speeds and multitasking that their machines would provide. Just as a 32 bit processor and a 64 bit processor cannot be compared with respect to office productivity; similarly, it is better if we don’t compare these processors as well, on the level of their office productivity. You cannot actually notice a spreadsheet launching faster on your screen or your letters being typed faster. Both the organizations are equivalent, when compared on the basis of their office productivity. But, coming down to multitasking, AMD with its 64 bit processors provided better multitasking features and none of the Intel’s processors, before the launching of the Core 2 Duo processors could match up to it. But with the entry of Intel’s Core 2 Duo and Quadcore on the scene, we can again consider the situation balanced. Before we end this discussion, let us consider a few more common features that both these processors can handle equivalently. It may not be of much concern to many people, but the processors manufactured by both the organizations support the sharing of the DDR2 RAM, peripherals and the video cards equally well. As a computer user, it is, in fact not necessary, to be a die-hard fan follower of the chips of either organizations. Just wait for the more advanced chip to be launched; it may be from any organization, but you will definitely be the one to benefit.

Which is Better – AMD or Intel for Gaming?

For gaming , what matters the most is how big is the graphic card or the video card. It would be interesting to know that AMD produces their processors keeping the ATI graphic cards in mind, whereas Intel makes their laptops to run better with Nvidia graphic cards. Quite surprisingly, it was found that AMD machines had exceptional quality graphics as compared to Intel’s. Hence, if you are a hardcore gamer or like to watch everything in HD, then it is better to bet on an AMD processor laptop. Hence, AMD can be a clear winner between AMD vs Intel for gaming. We cannot neglect the reputation of Intel at the same time for producing some amazing processors time and time again. Again, Intel has lately stormed the market with their phenomenal ‘Core i’ series, which are truly amazing for their overall performance. I would say, analyze as per your usage and then decide upon which is better, AMD or Intel. If you want your computer for multimedia use like for gaming, music or video editing, etc., and want a gaming laptop, then I would suggest to get an AMD powered machine. On the other hand, if you don’t mind spending more on a computer for its overall performance and the efficient battery consumption, then nothing can be better than Intel. It can be analyzed that, with AMD processors, you are able to get 90% of overall satisfaction with 60% of price. Whereas, with Intel based machines you can get over 98% or more of overall satisfaction with equal percentage of price.

AMD vs Intel Processor Comparison Chart

User Requirement

AMD

Intel

Power Consumption

Less efficient than Intel

More efficient than AMD

Price Range

Lower

Higher

Cooling Factor

Heats up faster

Runs cooler for a longer duration

Performance Speed

Not very Fast, compared to Intel

Faster than AMD

Gaming and Multimedia

Better multimedia output due to faster clocking

Not very good for gaming

Performance:Price

High:Low

High:High

(Specifications)>Example AMD & Intel

Product

AMD Phenom II X4

Intel Core i7

Model Number

965

I7-880

Cpu Part Number

HDX965FBK4DGM

BV80605002505AG

Core Number

Deneb

4MB shared L3 cache

2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

1066MHz frontside bus

3MB shared L2 cache

Socket

Socket AM2+ / Socket AM3

Socket 1156

Frequency (MHz)

3400

3067

Clock Multiplier

L1 cache

256 KB (code) / 256 KB (data)

128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)

L2 cache (KB)

2048

1024

L3 cache (KB)

6144

8922

Max temperature (Ã¯¾°C)

TDP (Watt)

125

>Conclusion

Finally, we look at to the basic features, that every computer user is worried about – the level of office productivity, internet browsing speeds and multitasking that their machines would provide. Just as a 32 bit processor and a 64 bit processor cannot be compared with respect to office productivity, Similarly, it is better if we don’t compare these processors as well, on the level of their office productivity. But, in this multitasking sides , AMD Phenom II X4 with its 64 bit processors provided better multitasking features and none of the Intel’s processors, Before we end this discussion, let us consider a few more common features that both these processors can handle equivalently. It may not be of much concern to many people, but the processors manufactured by both the organizations support the sharing of the DDR2 RAM, peripherals and the video cards equally well. As a computer user, it is, not necessary, to be a fan follower of the chips of either organizations. Just wait for the more advanced chip to be launched; it may be from any organization, but you will definitely be the one to benefit.

Order Now