Batch Reactor As A Plant Engineering Essay
What is a plant unit. All Equipment that make up a plant can be divided into 3 different categories or levels, the highest being the Plant as a whole, then the plant units and the lowest are the plant items.
While the actual plant performs an overall production, the Plant unit refers to the main components of a Plant which perform a major production function of the Plant and without which the Plant can not continue its operations. A Plant unit is made up of items but it can be replaced as a whole (Anthony Kelly…)
In this Plant, the Batch Reactor receives raw materials from the raw material storage, processes them for a certain amount of time then transfers them to the centrifuge feed vessel.
From the above diagram, it is obvious that the Batch Reactor is a major component of the plant and from its function it is seen that the reactor must process the raw material for progress to be made to the next stage of production.
I am therefore concluding this as my explanation as to why the Batch reactor is a plant unit.
Explain Your Reasons For Concluding That This Unit Is Critical For Production.
Several Factors determine how critical a piece of equipment is to production. They include:
Will the Equipment affect safety in the plant?
Will the Equipment not working cause downtime in the plant?
How easily can the Equipment be maintained?
What is the cost of this maintenance?
What is the current situation of the Equipment? (Paul Wheelhouse)
Now each of the factors can be used to examine the Batch Reactor and after which an educated decision can be made.
The Batch Reactor affects the safety in the plant because its function involves the heating of chemicals under pressure and its failure might cause the leakage of these chemicals or at the worst lead to an explosion in the Plant.
If the Batch Reactor was to stop working, there would be prolonged downtime until it is fixed; this is due to the fact that the Reactor performs a major function in the Plant without which further production would come to a halt.
The Batch Reactor is made up of a number of different items, some of which can be run-to-failure, but for the most an established schedule of maintenance must be made for. Without such a schedule, maintenance would be most difficult to carry out.
The cost of maintaining the Batch Reactor may vary but if is not properly attended to; one fault might lead to another even bigger one so the cost of maintaining might increase.
The items in the Batch Reactor have a life plan which is currently not being kept to; this means the Equipment requires monitoring to avoid random failure or prolonged breakdown and downtime.
On the account of the above facts, it is my belief that the Batch Reactor needs to be labelled as critical.
Extract Any User Requirements For This Designated Unit From The Plant Description. Are There Any Production Windows?
What are User requirements? This simply refers to the specifications that are inbuilt in a piece of equipment so that it might be able to fulfil the end user’s needs according to those tasks which it is used to perform.
In line with the plant description given on this particular Batch Reactor, a number of user requirements can be ascertained and these are listed below:
To receive 18te of raw materials from the raw material storage.
To remain sealed and heat its contents through a preset temperature / time profile by use of a temperature control system consisting of a thermocouple in a temperature pocket, a temperature controller and a control valve.
That the control valve regulates the supply of low pressure steam.
That its temperature alarm signal when the temperature exceeds 1250C.
That all safety relief valves work in event of an increase of temperature past the safety limit of 1250C.
That the bottom run off valve opens when the operation is complete and releases the contents from the Batch reactor to the centrifuge feed vessel by the discharge pump.
That the operation lasts 10 hours only.
What is a production window? This is a period during production in which maintenance procedures can be carried out without causing a halt in production. With emphasis on the Batch reactor it can be seen that there is a production window and this can be explained below.
While the batch reactor makes 18te of product every 10 hours, the centrifuge processes this product at a rate of 1.5te an hour i.e. it would have completely used up the 18te of product in 12 hours. Since it takes 10 hours for the batch reactor to work, this would give a 2 hour production window in which it can be properly maintained.
Also depending on the capacity of the centrifuge storage vessel, it is possible for the batch reactor to work overtime filling this feed vessel up and then be switched off and maintained while the centrifuge is operated using the previously stored produce in the centrifuge feed vessel.
Extract Any Corporate Requirements for This Unit From The Plant Description.
What are corporate requirements? These are the requirements which the upper management or Business sector of the company running plant desire from its industrial operations in order to make a suitable return on its investments (ROI).
From the plant description the following corporate requirements can be made below:
That its keeps to its scheduled annual shutdown period of 16 hours during week 40 each year.
That all maintenance pertaining to the batch reactor abides by the “permit to work” system which controls all maintenance activities.
That the batch reactor achieves a 25 year life and that the gearboxes achieve a 15 year life as well.
That the batch reactor remains well-painted, clean and tidy at all times.
Extract Any Legislative Requirements for This Unit From The Plant Description.
What are legislative requirements? These are Plant requirements made by the Law, rules or regulations or the Country in which the Plant operates. They must be implemented in order for the plant to avoid sanctions or being shut down.
In this particular plant description they include:
That the Batch Reactor abides by the rules by the FDA and British pharmaceutical Society put in place for their license holders.
All production and maintenance activities involving the Batch reactor comply with the Good Manufacturing practise (GMP).
That the processes involving the Batch Reactor are as okayed by the quality standard ISO 9002.
That the batch reactor conforms to the environmental standard ISO14000.
That if used by the Pharmaceutical inspection team, the batch reactor must pass any risk-based inspections based on a DNV methodology that might be carried out.
Comment On If Some of The tasks Designed For Shutdown Could be Done During Production Windows Or When The Plant Is Online. Could Any Of These Tasks Be Designated For Completion During Production Windows Be Completed Online?
We have previous explained what production windows are and when a Plant is online refers to when the plant is carrying its usual operational procedures. From the work done previously in section 1.3, we now know that there is a definite 2 hour production window during which the batch reactor can be maintained while the centrifuge is working. In looking at the life plan for the batch reactor unit, there are a certain amount of tasks that could be done in 2 hours and should be moved from shut down to production window, these are:
The replacement of the trim of the CV1 every 2 years.
The pressure testing and inspection of the SV1 every 6 years.
The visual check of the Agitator every 6 years.
The SV2 pressure testing and inspection every 6 years.
There is only one task put to be completed when there is a production window and it can be done while the Plant is online. This is the weekly visual check on the Agitator coupling, because if it is checked while online it might lead to the location of which wouldn’t have being seen if the equipment was offline.
Analyse The Recorded Jobs From The Computer Maintenance Management System (CMMS) For This Unit. Is There Any Evidence Which Confirms That The Life Plan Is Being Carried out? Is There Any Evidence To Say If The Life Plan Is Effective Or Not?
What is a Life plan? All plant units or manufacturing stages in production are designed to have a certain life. To fulfil this, maintenance plans are put in place to achieve this expected equipment life and if possible, to exceed it. These maintenance plans are called Life plans. (Wheelhouse, 2008)
On comparing the life plan of the batch reactor to the computer maintenance management system (CMMS) it can be seen that the life plan isn’t being carried out. This is due to the factor that there is a remarkable difference between the standard time taken to maintain every single unit item in the reactor and the actual time the job was done in hours, meaning the maintenance done cannot be adequately planned for and could lead to excessive downtime.
It can be seen that for this singular reason the life plan of the batch reactor is not capable of being effective.
Use The Figures, Plant Description And The Data From The CMMS To Analyse The Unit Into Its Maintenance Causing Items.
Using the figure 1 shown previously and the figure 2 shown directly above as well as the Life plan and the CMMS, the maintenance causing items can be broken down as done bel
Batch Chemical Reactor
CV1
Agitator Coupling
Temperature controller
Gearbox
Motor bearing
Oil seal
Agitator
Trim
Agitator gear box
Reactor Vessel
Temperature sensor
Pump
Motor
Pump bearing
SV1
SV2
P1
V1
Vessel
Jacket
Figure 3: The Maintenance Causing Items in a Batch Chemical Reactor
Develop your own life plan for these maintenance causing items using the task selection logic for Reliability Centred Maintenance.
RCM WORK SHEET SYSTEM: CHEMICAL PLANT
SUB-SYSTEM: BATCH CHEMICAL REACTOR
SUB-
SYSTEM
FUNCTION
FUNTIONAL
FAILURE
FAILURE
MODE
FAILURE
EFFECT
CRITICALITY
RESPONSE
TIME
FREQUENCY
CV1
Regulates supply of low
Pressure steam
Unable to supply
Steam at all.
Supplies
Inadequate steam
Faulty Trim
Absence or insufficient
Supply of steam
High
Replace trim
3 hrs
2 yearly
(Production window)
Agitator Motor
Gearbox
Transmit motion to the
Agitator
Fails to transmit motion
To the Agitator.
Broken seal
Shortage of lubrication
Damaged bearings
Worn gear teeth
Oil leakage
Damage to gearbox
Medium
Monitor vibrations
and check oil seal
and condition.
2 hrs (vibration
monitoring),
12 mins oil
inspection
Monthly Vibrations,
Daily oil & seal checks
(Online)
Agitator
Coupling
Connects Agitator motor gearbox
to Agitator for motion transmission
Doesn’t transmit motion
From gearbox to agitator.
Transmits inadequate
Motion.
Slackness in fitting
Doesn’t give agitator
The necessary
Transmitted motion.
Medium
Tighten coupling as
required.
6 mins
Daily (online)
Temperature
Controller
Controls the temperature making
sure it doesn’t exceed 1250 C
Unable to read the
correct temperature.
Faulty temperature
sensor .
Increase or reduction
of reactor temperature
on wrong information.
High
Recalibrate
temperature sensor.
2 hrs
2 year (Production
window)
SV1
Releases the pressure steam in the
vessel during times of alert.
Unable to release
excess pressure steam
Blockage at valve
outlet.
Crack in valve
Pressure steam is
not released properly or
in time.
High
Inspect, pressure test
and recondition if
necessary.
3 hrs
6 yearly (Shutdown)
SV2
Releases excess steam in the jacket
in times of alert
Unable to release
excess steam
Blockage at valve
outlet.
Crack in valve
Pressure steam is
not released properly or
in time.
High
Inspect, pressure test
and recondition if
necessary
3 hrs
Yearly (Production
window)
Agitator
Shakes, stirs & mixes the raw
materials in the reactor.
Unable to stir or mix
Raw materials.
Damaged blades
Eroded surface
Raw materials are
not mixed properly.
Medium
Recoat or replace as
necessary.
3 hrs
Re-coat or replace as
necessary.(Shutdown)
Jacket
Maintain its integrity and contain
raw materials during processing.
Leakage of materials
during processing.
Damaged or eroded
Parts.
Contents leak out
causing contamination.
High
Pressure test and
repair as necessary.
5 hrs
Yearly (Shutdown)
V1
Releases processed material to
P1 pump
Processed materials
not released
Leakage of material
during release
Blockage at valve
outlet
Crack in valve
Contents not released
properly.
Contents leak out
causing contamination.
High
Leak test and repair
if necessary.
15 mins
Daily test (Online)
P1
Transfer processed materials from
reactor to centrifuge feed vessel
Leaks material
Unable to pump
materials at all.
Pumps materials at
Wrong rate.
Replace seal if
necessary.
Replace pump if
necessary.
Contents leak.
Contents not pumped
properly
High
Condition
monitoring
Replace seal if
necessary
Replace pump if
necessary.
1.5 hrs
(Condition
Monitoring)
4 mins (Leak
test)
Monthly condition
Monitoring (Online),
Daily leak checks
(online)
Figure 1.4: Life Plan using RCM logic.
Compare and contrast between your Life plan with the one described previously, comment on any similarities and differences.
There are a number of ways in which my Life plan differs from the one previously given but there are also ways in which both are similar. Some of them are as listed below:
To begin, the first detail that can be noticed when comparing both life plans is that since I used the RCM selection logic, my life plan carries much more details as I included the functions, functional failures, failure modes, failure effect and criticality of each subsystem or item. This will be particularly useful in settling up priorities as the criticality of each subsystem is set at low, medium or high depending on the considerations of safety, performance and impact of the subsystem or item on the rest of the plant.
I brainstormed and added more failure modes and their activities than had being previously discovered or had activities planned for in the previous life plan so as to further prepare maintenance personnel to be able to tackle these failures if and when they do occur.
I changed the time frame for certain activities to take into consideration the new 2 hour production window that was discovered earlier. This will help reduce the amount tasks that are done during a shutdown and therefore cut down the downtime which the plant undergoes.
I increased the amount of time to be used to accomplish most tasks due to the fact that in the previous life plan, insufficient time was allocated to these tasks so therefore they couldn’t be planned or executed properly within the targets set for them.
Now in terms of similarities, I observed that the preventive maintenance and condition monitoring carried out on the Batch Reactor had ensured breakdowns were kept to a minimum so bearing this in mind, I retained all the activities from the old life plan and continued using them for the various items.
I also continued to carry out maintenance activities at the same frequency that was mapped out in the old life plan as I believe that the punctuality with which activities were carried out improved the reliability of the equipment.
CHAPTER 2
Describe The Philosophy of Total Productive Maintenance.
What is TPM? Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) refers to a management system for optimizing the productivity of manufacturing equipment through systematic equipment maintenance involving employees at all levels. Under TPM, everyone is involved in keeping the equipment in good working order to minimize production losses from equipment repairs, assists, set-ups, and the like. (http://www.siliconfareast.com/tpm.htm).
The goal of TPM is to increase production while at the same time boosting employee morale and job satisfaction. (Venkatesh. J) This is possible because there would be less downtime as TPM is carried out by the Operators on the items or machinery which they use as they, the maintainers and Designers work as a team towards the total elimination of equipment defects in the Plant (Paul Wheelhouse).
History of TPM
TPM is a Japanese idea that can be traced back to 1951 when preventive maintenance was introduced into Japan from the USA. Nippondenso, part of Toyota, was the first company in Japan to introduce plant wide preventive maintenance in 1960. In preventive maintenance operators produced goods using machines and the maintenance group was dedicated to the work of maintaining those machines. However with the high level of automation of Nippondenso, maintenance became a problem as so many more maintenance personnel were now required. So the management decided that the routine maintenance of equipment would now be carried out by the operators themselves. This is known as Autonomous maintenance, one of the features of TPM. The maintenance group then focussed only on “maintenance” works for upgrades. For pioneering TPM, Nippondenso became the 1st company to receive TPM certification (wikipedia).
Why Use TPM?
For TPM to be used in an Organisation, everyone from senior management to the operators on the floor must be carried along and made to understand why this particular system is being used. For this to happen effectively, the Motives, Objectives and benefits must be fully stated out and properly absorbed. The table below gives a generic illustration:
Motives of TPM
Adoption of life cycle approach for improving the overall performance of production equipment.
Improving productivity by highly motivated workers which is achieved by job enlargement.
The use of voluntary small group activities for identifying the cause of failure, possible plant and equipment modifications.
Uniqueness of TPM
The major difference between TPM and other concepts is that the operators are also made to involve in the maintenance process. The concept of “I (Production operators) Operate, You (Maintenance department) fix” is not followed.
TPM Objectives
Achieve Zero Defects, Zero Breakdown and Zero accidents in all functional areas of the organization.
Involve people in all levels of organization.
Form different teams to reduce defects and Self Maintenance.
Direct benefits of TPM
Increase productivity and OPE (Overall Plant Efficiency ) by 1.5 or 2 times.
Rectify customer complaints.
Reduce the manufacturing cost by 30%.
Satisfy the customers’ needs by 100 % (Delivering the right quantity at the right time, in the required quality.)
Reduce accidents.
Follow pollution control measures.
Indirect benefits of TPM
Higher confidence level among the employees.
Keep the work place clean, neat and attractive.
Favourable change in the attitude of the operators.
Achieve goals by working as team.
Horizontal deployment of a new concept in all areas of the organization.
Share knowledge and experience.
The workers get a feeling of owning the machine.
Figure 4 .TPM table
Source: An Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance (Venkatesh. J)
For TPM to start properly, the OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) should be calculated and a loss analysis performed to give both a baseline for continuous upgrading and ascertain the improvement priorities.
This will allow the operator/core maintenance team to prioritize and then tackle the 6 classic losses of:
Breakdowns
Set-ups and changeovers
Running at reduced speeds
Minor stops and idling
Quality defects, scrap, yield and rework
Starting up losses
The above losses add to the direct costs. Implementation of TPM attacks these and other direct (visible) costs as well as indirect (hidden) costs and follows each step in the production and supply chain from Management to the human resources to the Machine to the process, then to suppliers and finally to the customers (Willmott and McCarthy).
Components of TPM
Figure 4: Pillars of TPM
Source: An Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance (Venkatesh. J)
As shown above, TPM is made up of 8 main aspects which when combined present the full TPM package. They are:
The 5 S which are primarily the foundation of TPM and involve organising the workplace. These are sorting, systematising, sweeping, standardising and self-discipline.
Autonomous maintenance which refers to the operators handling most or in cases all of the maintenance concerning the machines which they operate.
Kobetsu Kaizen means small improvements or changes for the better of the organisation.
Planned maintenance entails scheduled maintenance which is done to ensure trouble free machines and equipments producing defect free products for total customer satisfaction.
Quality maintenance is aimed at providing customer satisfaction by providing the highest quality through defect free manufacturing.
Training to give employees a multi skilled edge.
Office TPM to ensure administrative efficiency as well.
Safety, health and environmental awareness to ensure zero accidents, zero health damages and zero fires (Venkatesh. J).
Describe a Case Study Where TPM has been successfully applied
The case study which I wish to use is that of RHP Bearings. This RHP Bearings branch which is in Blackburn, manufactures cast iron bearing housings for a variety of uses from agricultural machinery to fairground rides, and is one of seven RHP manufacturing sites in Europe owned by Japanese group NSK, the world’s second largest bearings manufacturer.
How TPM was carried out.
NSK acquired RHP in 1990, when the Blackburn site was under the imminent threat of closure because of high costs and the subsequent lack of competitiveness. Employing a staff of 93, TPM was then introduced to the site in 1993 but it didn’t see much success till 1996 due to the fact that the earlier efforts to drive TPM had been largely theoretical and the workforce faded to see its relevance to the everyday running of the plant. In 1996 a maintenance company was brought in to do a scoping study of the plant, conduct a workshop and support two pilot TPM projects.
The Plant Manager and the TPM facilitator then began to implement measures to ensure TPM was made directly relevant to the jobs of the staff. Operators were sent off to climb over their machines and log problems through a detailed condition appraisal, to establish a foundation for future TPM improvements.
TPM was piloted on two key machines, the PGM core making machine in the foundry and the Shiftnal sphering machine in the machine shop, using a detailed seven-step TPM implementation programme:
Collection and calculation of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Data
Assessing the six losses
Criticality assessment and condition appraisal
Risk assessment
Refurbishment plan
Asset care and best practice routines
Regular review for problem solving
TPM is applied to machines of all ages – from new to 30 years old, ensuring that older machinery is brought up to modern specification and newer machinery is kept in ‘as-new’ condition. The TPM was applied at the site by 9 different equipment teams focusing on specific machinery and involving 60% of the workforce. These teams included operators, maintainers, quality technicians and group leaders also drawing on help from personnel with specialist skills when necessary.
Each Team developed a standard routine for their respective machines using:
Autonomous Maintenance System (AMS) boards which show a schematic of the machine then tags with labels to show losses affecting availability, performance and quality. These labels are then used to generate TPM agendas for team meetings.
TPM step notices which illustrate the machine’s progress in TPM seven step programme.
Mainpac database which is used to gather machine performance details and calculate the OEE.
Key performance indicators which the teams use to accesses their improvement and progress in areas of waste sand, Gas emissions, Kaizen, Customer returns, lost time incidents, injurious accidents, Audit and product conformance.
Each team then has an activity board covering subjects such as milestone activities and previous day’s conformance result among others. To ensure TPM succeeded, Teams had to dedicate substantial time to carrying out laid down activities and held meetings as needed.
Benefits of TPM
Implementing TPM had both direct and indirect effect on the production system a combination of which generated major savings at RHP, Blackburn. Major Site-wide benefits were scored in the following areas:
€400,000 running costs saved
Unit cost reduced by 21%
Scrap reduced by 8%
Attracting increased capital investment currently at 15% of turnover and Customer returns reduced by 11%
Increased customer satisfaction
Improved safety record
Environmental and quality awards
Improvement in staff morale
The two key machines (The Shiftnal sphering and the PGM core making machine) also had major total cost saving OEE improvements as well as other time saving and cost reduction achievements making the TPM well worth it (Willmott and McCarthy).
Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM) As Applied in a Section of a Plant
What is RCM? RCM is a method for developing and selecting maintenance alternatives based on safety, operational and economical criteria. RCM employs a system perspective in its analyses of system functions, failures of functions and prevention of these functions (Jones, R.B).
So RCM requires in-depth of the machinery, detailing all logic problems and their maintenance solutions and as such can be quite time consuming, for this reason it is usually used only on the critical equipment. The use of RCM methodology requires that 7 questions be answered:
What are the functions of the Asset?
What are the functional failures?
What causes the functional failures?
What happens when the failure occurs?
How much does each failure matter?
Can we predict or prevent failure and should we be doing so?
How should we manage the failure if prediction or prevention is not an option?(Paul Wheelhouse)
Now in order to answer the above questions, a System analysis process is used to begin RCM on any section of the plant. This System process will implement several steps, all of which define and characterize RCM and will methodically delineate the information required for the maintenance:
Step 1. System selection and Information collection: Taking decisions as to what level of the plant at which to do the RCM and also choosing this system or section based on criticality i.e. based on function and impact on plant and environment.
Step 2. System Boundary Definition: This involves creating an accurate list of what is or is not part of the section so an accurate list of components can identified and to establish what comes in and what leaves the System(IN and OUT interfaces). This is necessary to ensure the accuracy of the Systems analysis process.
Step 3. System description and functional Block diagram: This is used to identify and document the essential details of a system that are needed to perform the remaining steps in a thorough and technical fashion. The five separate items are developed in this step:
System Description
Functional Block Diagram
IN/OUT interfaces
System Component list
Equipment history
Step 4. System Functions and Functional failures: involves classifying each OUT interface of the system into its functions and identifying the failures which might hinder these functions.
Step 5. Failure Mode and Effect analysis (FMEA): involves analyzing each component failure to discover which have the potential to disruption their function and then detailing what exactly these effects could be. This is done using functional failure-equipment matrix.
Step 6. Logic (Decision) Tree Analysis (LTA): the failure modes which pass through effects analysis will now go through this process. The purpose of this step is to further prioritize the emphasis and resources that should be devoted to each failure mode on the basis that all Authority (TVA). TVA is a power production plant wholly owed by the US government and equipment, functions and failures are not the same. The LTA identifies the failure modes in 3 aspects:
Safety
Downtime
Economics (Finance)
Step 7. Task selection: In this step, applicable maintenance tasks which are most effective to combat the detailed failure modes are listed, at the same time decisions on whether to run-to-failure or design out are taken as well.
Step 8. Task interval and Age Exploration: involves selection of the correct interval (or frequency or periodicity) at which to perform the preventive maintenance task on the equipment taking into consideration that the equipment changes as they age.
Step 9. Implementation of tasks: After all planning is done, the tasks are introduced to employees with details as to when and how they should be done.
Step 10. Feedback: Equipment performance is noted constantly so as to feed in back to the process and modifications can be made as needed.
The above covers all steps taken in carrying out RCM in a plant (Smith and Hinchcliffe).
Describe a Case Study Where RCM has been successfully applied
The case I wish to use is the Cumberland Fossil Plant (CFP) belonging to the Tennessee Valley has 11 plants, the one in Cumberland being the biggest.
The Cumberland Fossil Plant (CUF) is a 2-unit coal-fired steam plant capable of producing a base load of 2600 MWe (1300 MWe each unit) for the TVA grid system. One of the side effects of working with coal is it produces flue gas that contains Sulphur dioxide (SO2) which is a poisonous gas.
As part of it commitment to compliance with the 1990 Clean Air Act, TVA constructed flue gas desulphurization (FGD) scrubbers for both units at CUF. The scrubbers are designed to remove 94 percent of the Sulphur dioxide emissions in the flue gas-about 375,000 tons per year for the plant. The RCM was carried out on the Scrubber system or assembly.
System Selection and Description
To select a critical system in the scrubber a simple outline of the scrubbing process is necessary. The CUF scrubbers use a “wet process” to remove the SO2 , this process employs the use of tons of limestone which are pulverized, mixed with Raw water to form a slurry and then pumped to an absorber where the flue gas flows upwards through the slurry as the slurry flows down through the absorber vessel and recycle tank (as shown below). The chemical process, which takes place under carefully controlled density and pH parameters, converts the slurry-SO2 mixture to high-quality synthetic gypsum (Calcium sulphate) which is transferred as an effluent from the recycle tank to a holding pond. Each Scrubber unit has three absorber modules per unit.
Figure 5: CFU Scrubber schematic.
Source: RCM – Gateway to World-Class Performance (Smith and Hinchcliffe)
The Raw Water Subsystem was selected for RCM analysis because it supplies all the water used in Scrubber.
RCM analysis and Result
A three person team conducted an RCM analysis on the raw water subsystem over a 7 month period. The team represented an operations shift supervisor and senior personnel from the mechanical/electrical maintenance team. They worked 1 week each month to making a total of 35 days of applied efforts and came up with the following analysis and results:
Figure 2.3: The RCM Raw water subsystem analysis profile
Figure 2.4: PM task type profile for failure modes.
The above shows that 152 failure modes where discovered for which 156 PM tasks where specified and a ratio of 35 RCM to 98 conventional PM tasks.
RCM Implementation
This proved to be a smooth transition as the scrubber operation was young and so personnel easily adjusted to new task and maintenance, also the superintendent conducted hands on meetings with staff to explain the RCM use and benefits.
The mechanics of implementing the RCM tasks were also straightforward. Cumberland uses the MPAC CMMS software. The Conventional PM program, which had been loaded, was simply purged and replaced these with the RCM-based tasks. This included all of the non-intrusive CD and FF tasks.
Benefits of Using RCM
There were quite a number of benefits, some of the important ones are:
The RCM results presented credible evidence that the previous preventive maintenance program used to prepare tasks was excessive by as much as 3 times, so RCM presented a more realistic estimate for personnel to work with.
The RCM results identified the need for a redundant source of raw water to eliminate a series of plausible failure modes that could cut the primary water supply. This redundant water supply was installed to draw water from the powerhouse fly ash sluice water. To date, this backup water supply system has been used twice. The scrubber has never been the cause of a powerhouse outage.
A “local” pressure gage was pinpointed as critical to system control, and was converted to a direct readout in the control room.
Each Run-To-Failure decision was reviewed to assure that spares were available if long lead times were involved.
The level of understanding of the functional subsystems and their interrelationships was enhanced through the RCM process.
The FMEA information was used to train operators on transient and upset conditions that could occur.
(Smith and Hinchcliffe)
2.4 Compare and Contrast RCM and TPM for the Maintenance Strategy of a Processing Plant Manufacturing Chemicals. Are they in conflict or can They be used together?
TPM is a philosophy of total elimination of equipment defects by a team comprising of operators, maintainers and designers whereas RCM is a technique which enables the selection of the most appropriate maintenance to preserve the function of equipment. (Paul Wheelhouse). While RCM is an in-depth analysis of equipment, TPM also takes into consideration the human factors in maintenance.
They are different and complimentary approaches that can be used in the maintenance strategy of a chemical Plant. A Chemical Plant requires that all failures and disruptions on it Critical equipment are kept to a minimum to ensure safety and avoid danger to Plant, Environment and Personnel and using RCM abides by these necessities, pointing out methods these can be done more efficiently while ensuring the equipment isn’t over maintained.
A Chemical Plant also has strict legislation and procedures and needs a safe, clean environment for production, with the personnel getting proper training to combat all hazards that might occur while working in such a volatile system. TPM ensures personnel involvement at all levels to keeping the needed standards as well as making sure Plant as a whole remains competitive by reducing operating and maintaining cost, increasing production and reducing downtime as Operators can handle most maintenance tasks that would have previously left to specialist maintenance staff. This chain reaction also boosts staff morale and quality of products.
In all, both approaches make certain that all conceivable hazards both in critical equipment and in the entire assembly process are planned and prepared, that Plant personnel are properly briefed on the maintenance details for the equipment in their charge and disruptions in production are kept to a minimum. An integrated plan using both maintenance policies would be ideal for a Chemical Plant.
Order Now