Ischaemic Pain and Cold-induced Pain Experiment

Results

Ice water seems to bring about 60% more pain than tourniquet. Placebo was quite effective against tourniquet (91.7%±4.33) and had no effect on ice water (100.7%±2.74) which appeared to be the second strongest drug. Paracetamol 1000mg combined with 8mg of codeine had negative effect on tourniquet (105.9%±7.91) as students sensed more pain after taking drugs, and slight effect on ice water (97.2%±3.17) which made it become the weakest drug. Paracetamol 1000mg reduced the pain for tourniquet significantly (88.6%±7.94) and also did well against ice water (95.2%±3.55). Paracetamol 1000mg acted as the best drug for both tourniquet and ice water treatment. These results are shown in Figures 1 and 2 ( see Appendices for raw data and summary data). 

Figure 1. Effects of drugs on mean pain response sensed from tourniquet and ice water.

Mean pain units were measured for both tourniquet and ice water method for students. Students were then separated into groups A, B and C to take drug placebo, paracetamol 1000mg + Codeine 8mg and paracetamol 1000mg respectively. After 45 minutes the mean pain units were measured again for all of the students (± standard error, n=24).

Figure 2 Effects of drugs on mean % pain control response sensed from tourniquet and ice water.

Mean pain units were measured for both tourniquet and ice water method for students. Students were then separated into groups A, B and C to take drug placebo, paracetamol 1000mg + Codeine 8mg and paracetamol 1000mg respectively. After 45 minutes the mean pain units were measured again for all of the students . The pain levels after taking drugs were then divided by the pain units before taking drugs for each student to get the mean % control response (± standard error, n=24).

Discussion

  • Paracetamol is able to inhibit the cyclooxygenase (COX) and it is highly selective for Cytochrome c oxidase subunit II( COX-2) (Burkhard Hinz2008). Inhibition of COX enzymes causes the concentration of prostaglandin E2 to decrease, as a result, the hypothalamic set-point is lowered to reduce fever and the descending inhibitory serotonergic pathways is activated to produce analgesia (Anderson BJ 2008). Codeine is a pretty weak opioid analgesic. It has to be converted into morphine to function, this can be activated by the CYP2D6 metabolic. Codeine can reduce the analgesic efficacy in as the way it slow down the metabolizer of the drug(C. Mattia 2015). The combination of Paracetamol 1000mg with codeine 8mg is found to be more effective and safer than just using paracetamol or codeine (Aust Dent 2002).

On the other hand, placebo would simply have no effect on pain level as it is just a sugar pill.

As morphine inhibits hot and cold pain by inhibiting HPC but increases the firing of the cold cells, this leads to the burning sensation (Mogil 1999). This directly causes the paracetamol + codeine combination did not act what we thought, the burning sensation reduced the effectiveness of pain relief. As a result, for the ice water test, paracetamol worked as the best treatment and placebo was the weakest treatment.

Read also  Natural product chemistry

And for the tourniquet test which causes ischemic pain, muscle contraction increases hydrogen ions causes pH decreases and leads to acidosis, and infusion rate of acidic buffer increased and causes pain (Issberner 1996). However codeine and its product morphine are both hydrogen donors and would further increase the concentration of hydrogen inside muscle and causes more pain (Atkinson AP 2011). This explains why the paracetamol + codeine had negative effect on tourniquet test.

The experiment result did not match up with hypothesis as paracetamol with codeine is not the most effective drug for both ice water and tourniquet tests. There are some steps for this experiment that can be improved. First of all at the beginning of the experiment, students’ cells were ‘asleep’ and takes time to ‘wake up’ and sense the pain correctly. Especially for ice water, as human skin would always get covered by a layer of oil secreted by sebaceous glands and dirt from environment mixture, the first attempt in ice water would take time to wash the layer off the skin and causes less pain sensed, after taking drugs, students’ arm were no longer protected and therefore would sense a stronger pain level faster, also the amount of ice in the tank was different and might causes error for the result. For tourniquet, students might not squeeze the rubble bulb correctly and causes difference between two runs.

This experiment can be improved by getting a rubble bulb that squeeze itself automatically each time with same strength; maintain the ice water with same amount of ice and temperature; put arm into the ice water to wash off the layer and also ‘wake it up’ before attempt the experiment, after five minutes of recovery (let the arm to warm up and get dried) then start the experiment. This experiment result can be used in clinical treatment and develop pain-relief drugs.

In conclusion, the paracetamol 1000mg is the most effective drug to relieve both ischaemic pain and cold-induced pain.

Appendices

Table 1. Raw data collected and summary data for pain sensed before and after taking placebo.

The mean, median, standard deviation (stdev), standard error of the mean (SEM) and n values calculated for pain units and % of pain changed before and after taking placebo.Mean pain units were measured for both tourniquet and ice water method for students. Student took placebo and after 45 minutes the mean pain units were measured again for all of the students . The pain levels after taking drugs were then divided by the pain units before taking drugs for each student to get the mean % control response ( n=24).

Read also  Gas Solid Chromatography And Gas Liquid Chromatography Chemistry Essay

Tourniquet 0

Tourniquet 45

Ice water 0

Ice water 45

Tourniquet % control

Ice Water % Control

380

390

625

640

102.6

102.4

335

260

610

670

77.6

109.8

332

150

655

627

45.2

95.7

400

250

375

350

62.5

93.3

401

295

564

592

73.6

105.0

275

200

563

570

72.7

101.2

320

255

675

575

79.7

85.2

265

305

265

300

115.1

113.2

191

200

577

482

104.7

83.5

447

397

672

660

88.8

98.2

169

190

668

646

112.4

96.7

245

295

580

535

120.4

92.2

280

300

485

390

107.1

80.4

475

430

675

605

90.5

89.6

270

285

550

620

105.6

112.7

390

300

575

585

76.9

101.7

380

388

663

675

102.1

101.8

275

310

445

500

112.7

112.4

225

150

385

570

66.7

148.1

543

580

140

145

106.8

103.6

400

425

575

525

106.3

91.3

325

400

700

700

123.1

100.0

161

138

291

277

85.7

95.2

395

243

680

697

61.5

102.5

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

median

328.5

295

576

580

96.3

100.6

mean

328.29

297.33

541.38

539.00

91.7

100.7

stdev

96.97

106.14

150.86

146.49

21.2

13.4

SEM

19.79

21.67

30.79

29.90

4.33

2.74

Table 2. Raw data collected and summary data for pain sensed before and after taking paracetamol 1000mg + codeine 8mg.

The mean, median, standard deviation (stdev), standard error of the mean (SEM) and n values calculated for pain units and % of pain changed before and after taking placebo.Mean pain units were measured for both tourniquet and ice water method for students. Student took paracetamol 1000mg + codeine 8mgand after 45 minutes the mean pain units were measured again for all of the students . The pain levels after taking drugs were then divided by the pain units before taking drugs for each student to get the mean % control response ( n=24).

Tourniquet 0

Tourniquet 45

Ice water 0

Ice water 45

Tourniquet % control

Ice Water % Control

380

340

630

625

89.5

99.2

533

538

471

525

100.9

111.5

225

320

550

565

142.2

102.7

350

275

597

585

78.6

98.0

345

150

647

675

43.5

104.3

575

260

645

520

45.2

80.6

175

300

425

530

171.4

124.7

249

234

353

299

94.0

84.7

280

160

600

520

57.1

86.7

255

163

648

615

63.9

94.9

263

250

660

665

95.1

100.8

260

280

355

340

107.7

95.8

200

375

440

420

187.5

95.5

185

160

540

325

86.5

60.2

435

368

600

595

84.6

99.2

345

315

535

435

91.3

81.3

315

265

472

575

84.1

121.8

220

300

575

600

136.4

104.3

450

545

565

683

121.1

120.9

235

418

476

523

177.9

109.9

125

160

595

555

128.0

93.3

277

370

670

660

133.6

98.5

60

63

511

500

105.0

97.8

460

540

565

378

117.4

66.9

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

median

270

290

565

542.5

98.0

98.2

mean

299.88

297.88

546.88

529.71

105.9

97.2

stdev

125.33

127.25

92.13

112.04

38.8

15.5

SEM

25.58

25.97

18.81

22.87

7.91

3.17

Read also  The candy chromatography

Table 3 Raw data collected and summary data for pain sensed before and after taking paracetamol 1000mg.

The mean, median, standard deviation (stdev), standard error of the mean (SEM) and n values calculated for pain units and % of pain changed before and after taking placebo.Mean pain units were measured for both tourniquet and ice water method for students. Student took paracetamol 1000mgand after 45 minutes the mean pain units were measured again for all of the students . The pain levels after taking drugs were then divided by the pain units before taking drugs for each student to get the mean % control response ( n=24).

Tourniquet 0

Tourniquet 45

Ice water 0

Ice water 45

Tourniquet % control

Ice Water % Control

460

480

390

370

104.3

94.9

584

400

980

674

68.5

68.8

250

350

550

625

140.0

113.6

210

225

585

610

107.1

104.3

300

175

590

555

58.3

94.1

455

415

530

600

91.2

113.2

165

100

460

390

60.6

84.8

280

80

600

400

28.6

66.7

257

195

640

645

75.9

100.8

195

185

555

550

94.9

99.1

242

200

560

612

82.6

109.3

270

260

405

250

96.3

61.7

330

310

605

635

93.9

105.0

295

240

445

375

81.4

84.3

313

253

695

655

80.8

94.2

61

85

380

290

139.3

76.3

205

330

525

570

161.0

108.6

165

50

325

435

30.3

133.8

180

260

675

550

144.4

81.5

230

125

585

615

54.3

105.1

373

363

585

443

97.3

75.7

170

250

650

625

147.1

96.2

275

25

270

300

9.1

111.1

528

415

585

595

78.6

101.7

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

median

263.5

245

572.5

562.5

86.9

97.6

mean

283.04

240.46

548.75

515.38

88.6

95.2

stdev

123.24

125.39

143.93

131.49

38.9

17.4

SEM

25.16

25.60

29.38

26.84

7.94

3.55

References

Anderson BJ. Paracetamol (acetaminophen): mechanisms of action. Pediatr Anesth 2008;18:915-21.

Aust Dent J. 2002 Jun;47(2):147-51.Paracetamol versus paracetamol-codeine in the treatment of post-operative dental pain: a randomized, double-blind, prospective trial. Macleod AG1, Ashford B, Voltz M, Williams B, Cramond T, Gorta L, Simpson JM

Burkhard Hinz,Olga Cheremina and Kay Brune, February 2008, The FASEB Journalvol. 22 no. 2 383-390

C. Mattia, F. Coluzzi, 2015,A look inside the association codeine-paracetamol: clinical pharmacology supports analgesic efficacy, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, Vol. 19 – N. 3, Pages: 507-516.

Oxford, 2007, league table of analgesic efficacy, viewed 13 May 2015, http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/painpag/acutrev/analgesics/leagtab.html.

Issberner, Reeh and Steen (1996) Pain due to tissue acidosis: a mechanism for inflammatory and ischemic myalgia? Neuroscience Letters, Vol 208, 191-194.

Mogil and Adhikari (1999) Hot and cold nociception are genetically correlated. The Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 19, RC25, 1-5.

Order Now

Order Now

Type of Paper
Subject
Deadline
Number of Pages
(275 words)