Quality management system & pharmaceuticals
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION:
Life science companies experience no lack of quality system ideas, quality system conversation, quality system arguments, quality system implementation methods, etc.
After all, even the required systems of quality management such as the FDA’s GMP, GCP and GLP regulations and guidelines are specified to a certain extent but still don’t determine all of the whens, hows, whys and whats of in-house quality system management. As a result, life science companies are left with a few decisions to make:
1) On what system(s) should a quality system be based?
2) How will the quality system’s data be managed?
3) How will the quality system’s documentation be managed?
4) What will be the KPIs (key performance indicators) of the quality system?
5) How will a need for improvement be justified?
A truth is that big pharmaceutical companies never worried about cutting costs and improving efficiencies because the industry didn’t have to. The cost-containment and process-improvement obsession of the rest of the manufacturing world was never a worry for the pharmaceutical industry, simply because it was too wealthy to worry about it
Instead of cost restraints and improved efficiencies, the focus of pharma companies has always been on The Next Big Thing. It was only five years ago that pharma companies even started to become interested in managing front-end costs through methodologies like lean and Six Sigma.
The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.
ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.
Aim & Objectives
The overall aim of this project is to check the QUALITY MANAGMENT SYSTEMS (QMS). Does a QMS improve the quality of the systems, Do formal certifications like ISO 9001 and DEMING ,BALRIDGE ,EFQM support and encourage developers to use the QMS and by this increase the quality of their work? And also check QMS in Pharmaceutical industry and is it benefit form these QMS.
In order to meet the aim following objectives have been defined:
1. What is QMS
2. To define QMS and types of QMS, like ISO 9001 and DEMING ,BALRIDGE ,GMP
3. Defining the clauses of ISO series
4. To identify Relationship of ICH Q10 to Regional GMP Requirements, ISO Standards and ICH Q7
5. To identify how Pharmaceutical get benefit from QMS
6. To identify how pharmaceutical can be improved by QMS
1.1Project context
This project represents some important theory on this subject. The basic concept behind this project is to check which Quality Management System is adopted in different pharmaceutical companies.
1.2 Structure of this report
Chapter 1 of this report emphasises the importance of the study in the current climate and objectives as well.
Chapter 2 explains the methodology adopted and how this methodology helped to achieve aims and objectives.
Chapter 3 reviews literature relating to Quality Management Systems in the pharmaceutical. Internet, library or e-journals were used as source of the literature.
Chapter 4 analyses how survey has been done
Chapter 5 represent the results
Chapter 6 discuss the finding of the survey
Chapter 7 making conclusion on survey findings
Chapter 8 explains how can further study be done in this field.
Chapter 2
METHODOLOGY
2.1 Introduction
This chapter elaborates how the research study was carried out .It also talks about the limitation of the research and methods used in this research.
When the writer was studying the module of Quality Management Systems (QMS),writer developed his mind initially of doing the project in QMS. The writer discussed this with the supervisor and writer was encouraged by the supervisor. The writer started the research about different kind of quality systems specially about ISO 9000.
2.1.1 Ideas
The writer started the project as the studying different kind of quality management systems. During that study writer got many ideas but he was not much confident that what to do. So he went to supervisor and discussed the situation with him. Then writer decide to do the comparisons between the different kind of quality management systems.
2.1.2 Choosing Specific Industry
While going through the literature review, writer came to know that there are different QMS in different industries. The writer has to choose one industry to go in more details and in more specific. So writer initially decide to investigate about the electrical instrument manufacturing industry. The writer went to supervisor to talk about it. But during that discussion writer analysed the situation and feel that it is going to be very difficult to study about electrical manufacturing industry as writer have not background in that field and have not much knowledge about it. So the writer decides in pharmaceutical industry. As there is not much work done of QMS in that industry.
In order to gain adequate knowledge and clear understanding of the topic, sufficient information was gathered through internet, books and journals.
During that writer studied that pharmaceutical industry use ISO 9000 and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) quality systems. So the writer starts more research about these systems. Writer started learning more about the ISO 9000 clauses. The write also study that GMP as QMS. The writer also researched about the relationship between ISO 9000 and GMP.
Having discussion with supervisor writer make 6 objectives for the project.
7. What is QMS
8. To define QMS and types of QMS, like ISO 9001 and DEMING ,BALRIDGE ,GMP
9. Defining the clauses of ISO series
10. To identify Relationship of ICH Q10 to Regional GMP Requirements, ISO Standards and ICH Q7
11. To identify how Pharmaceutical get benefit from QMS
12. To identify how pharmaceutical can be improved by QMS
2.1.3Questionnaire
As writer aims to find out that which kind of Quality Management Systems are used in pharmaceuticals and how these are used, writer decided to do a survey type of questionnaire. To do questionnaire survey writer searched the internet to find out the pharmaceutical companies which can be possible target. To do survey first the writer decided to do online survey but later he find out that it is going to be difficult as companies are less responsive to do that. So he decide to do postal survey. He developed a questionnaire with the help of supervisor.
The overall aim of the study was achieved under the six objectives under the following 2 methods
Necessary information was collected by doing literature review. Literature review was carried using past research papers, books, journals and articles about Quality Management Systems(QMS) in pharmaceutical.
Survey questionnaire helped to gather current and practical information. Prepared questionnaires were sent out to pharmaceutical companies in the UK. There response were analysed statistically
The table below shows how methodology
Objectives |
Literature review |
questionnaire |
1 |
x |
x |
2 |
x |
x |
3 |
x |
x |
4 |
x |
x |
5 |
x |
x |
6 |
x |
x |
2.2 literature review
The literature review provides necessary knowledge base to build up the project. It starts with the information gathering to understand the background topic concerned. The main resources of the literature review were from books and journals of the library and from the internet. As for as the selected topic is concerned, internet is better choice for collecting information as it provide more updates information.
Studying the literature provided various advantages.
Helped to understand the definitions, theories and past studies.
Helped to know about other studies on this topic and provided broader knowledge about topic.
Facilitated identifying the gap between the current study and the past study of the project.
The review would represent the research carried out by the others
2.3 Survey Questionnaire
Questionnaire used as another technique for collecting information. Supervisor assisted to modify and amend the questionnaire prepared by the writer.
CHAPTER 3
THEORY
3.1 QUALITY IN GENERAL
From a long time, a lot of theories and definitions are written about the quality and methods involving quality. Many authors and scientists write about quality. B.G.Dale(B.G.Dale,”Developing, Introducing and Sustaining TQM”, 2004) also write a book about total quality which is consider through out the world. The following chapter is mainly extract from the B.G.Dale book and my own views.
Quality has many meanings, ranging from luxury and merit to excellence, good value for money or convenience and even practicality. It is often defined simply as ‘fitness for purpose’. Quality is a multi-faceted concept; different dimensions of quality will be important to different users.
These days global marketplace the demands of customers are for ever increasing as they want improved quality of the products and services. In some markets there is an increasing supply of competitively priced products and services from low labour cost countries such as China, Vietnam and India. The main threats companies faces up these days are continuous improvement in total business activities with focus on the customer throughout the entire organization and an emphasis on flexibility and quality.
This why many companies are using quality management and continuous improvement as their tools to have edge over their rivals in increasingly aggressive markets. The companies that do not manage this change will fail.
Feigenbaum and Feigenbaum (1999) point out that:
Total Quality is a major factor in the business quality revolution creators of sales and revenue growth, genuinely good new jobs, and soundly based and sustainable business expansion.
Today in many markets quality still narrowly defined as the reliability of product and service quality. It is now expected an entry-level characteristic to the marketplace.
What is Quality?
Dale (2004) describes a number of different definitions of the word quality and show how it is often loosely used. For example, when case is put for funding or resources, just count the number of times the word quality is used in the argument or presentation.
While many people speak of quality and they say that they know what meaning of quality. They frequently fail to give an appropriate definition that would allow its measurement and assessment. In fact it is difficult for many people to understand the concept and definition of the quality.
“In a linguistic sense, quality originates from the Latin word ‘qualis’ which means ‘such as the thing really is’. There is an international definition of quality, the ‘degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils requirements’ (BS EN ISO9000 (2000)).”
The definition of quality is often unclear, but it is always used to indicate that one organization is better than another. Because of this the definition used at anytime should meet the following points.
1 The person using the word must have a clear and full understanding of its meaning.
2 The people/audience to whom the communication is directed should have a similar understanding of quality to the person making the communication.
3 Understanding and then satisfying customer requirements in order to improve our business results.
4 Continuously improving our behaviour and attitudes as well as our processes, products and services.
5 Ensuring that a customer focus is visible in all that we do. There are a number of ways or senses in which quality may be defined, some being broader than others but they all can be boiled down to either meeting requirements and specifications or satisfying and delighting the customer. These different definitions are now examined.
Qualitative
The standard document BS EN ISO9000 (2000) says that ‘the term “quality” can be used with adjectives such as poor, good or excellent’. The following are some examples of this:
There are many slogans which are used to attract the customers and buyers to buy the products and services are the best: Esso – Quality at Work; Hayfield Textiles – Committed to Quality; Kenco – Superior Quality; Philips Whirlpool – Brings Quality to Life; Thompson Tour Operations – Thompson Quality Makes the World of Difference.
For television and radio commentators use word quality like quality player, quality performance and quality goal. By directors and managers (quality performance, quality of communications).By people, in general (quality product, top quality, high quality, original quality, quality time, quality of communications, quality person, loss of quality, German quality, 100 per cent quality).
It is frequently found that in such cases of ‘quality speak’ the context in which the word quality is used is highly subjective and in its strictest sense is being misused.
For example, there are many high street shops which trades under the name of ‘quality seconds’. A van was recently spotted with the advertising slogan ‘Quality Part-Worn Tyres’ on its side.”
Quantitative
Quantitative definitions are required to manage quality effectively. This is defined in BS4778 (1991) as “When a continuing series of lots is considered, a quality level which for the purposes of sampling inspection is the limit of a satisfactory process’. This is when quality is paradoxically defined in terms of non-conforming parts per hundred (i.e. some defined degree of imperfection).”
Some times an AQL is imposed by a customer on its supplier in relation to a particular contract. In this situation customer will inspect the batch according to the sampling scheme. If there are more number of defective items than allowed numbers, the entire batch will be returned. Some companies used AQL under the mistaken concept that trying to eliminate all the defects is too costly.
Dale (2004) describes the benefits and disadvantages of setting AQL.The setting of an AQL by a company can work against a ‘right first time’ mentality in its people as it appears to condone the production and delivery of nonconforming parts or services, suggesting that errors are acceptable to the organization. It is tantamount to planning for failure. For example, take a final product which is made up of 3,000 parts: if the standard set is a 1 per cent AQL, this would mean that the product is planned to contain 30 non-conforming parts. In all reality there are likely to be many more because of the vagaries of the sampling used in the plan or scheme, whereby acceptance or rejection of the batch of product is decided.
3.2 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS(QMS)
A report was published from Department of trade and industry UK in 2007 which explain the basic concepts of Quality management systems (QMS).The following chapter is build on the points which is given in that report.
Any company or organization will be benefit by implementation of an effective quality management system(QMS). The basic concept is customer and supplier working together for their mutual benefits. Due to this the customer and supplier relation go beyond boundary.
A QMS can be defined as ” A set of co-ordinate activities to direct and control an organisation in order to continually improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its performance “.
While studying the each one activities in the system will not help to understand the system as whole. The main purpose of the QMS is defining the processes which will result in the production of quality products and services rather than in detecting products or services after they have been produced.
The benefits of a QMS
QMS will ensure that these two requirements are met:
1 The customer requirements – confidence in the ability of the organisation to deliver the desired product and service consistently meeting their needs and expectations.
2 The organisation’s requirements – both internally and externally, and at an optimum cost with efficient use of the available resources – materials, human, technology and information.
These requirements can only be met if objective is given, in the form of information and data .to support the systems activities, from the ultimate supplier to the ultimate customer.
An organisation having QMS can achieve the goals and objectives set out in its policy and strategy .This will provide consistency and satisfaction in terms of methods, materials, equipment and ending with their satisfaction, at every transaction interface
Quality management systems are needed in all areas of activity, whether large or small business, manufacturing, service or public sector
A good QMS will
· Set direction and meet customers expectations
· Improve process control
· Reduce wastage
· Lower costs
· Increase market share
· Facilitate training
· Involve staff
· Raise morale
In a survey conducted by the Defence Evaluation Research Agency (DERA), ca.96% of respondents said they believed their systems contributed to meeting the business goals. However, ca. 72% responded that their organisation did not measure this contribution.
3.2.1 QMS AND International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
There are many models used to define and assess the performance of a company or organization, For example CMM, EFQM, Baldrige, ISO. They have many features in common and some differences. In this section I describe QMS and ISO approved.
ISO is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is carried out through ISO technical committees, in liaison with international organisations, governmental and non-governmental bodies. ISO’s most recent family of standards for quality management systems are currently in their final draft (FDIS) form, and comprises:
· ISO/FDIS 9000:2000 – Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary
· ISO/FDIS 9001:2000 – Quality management systems – Requirements
· ISO/FDIS 9004:2000 – Guidelines for performance improvement
They are basically built over the business processes, with strong focus on improvement and meeting the needs of customers. After every six years these standards are reviewed and adaptable to all kind of organizations.
ISO 9001 and ISO 9004 are designed to be used together but can also be used independently. The ISO 9002 and ISO 9003 are to be discontinued.
The ISO series make the form by which a holistic management system can be implemented, into which quality, health and safety and environmental responsibility can be integrated, with the audits carried out either separately or in combination.
3.2.2 ISO 9001
ISO 9001 specifies the requirements for QMS that may be used by organisations for internal application, certification or contractual purposes.
The approach is shown in the conceptual model from the ISO 9000 standard
The major clauses and sub-clause are:
· Scope
· Normative reference
· Terms and definitions
· Quality management system
General requirements
Documentation requirements
· Management responsibility
Management commitment
Customer focus
Quality policy
Planning
Responsibility, authority and communication
Management review
· Resource management
Provision of resources
Human resources
Infrastructure
Work environment
· Product realisation
Planning of product realisation
Customer-related processes
Design and/or development
Purchasing
Production and service operations
Control of measuring and monitoring devices
· Measurement, analysis and improvement
General
Planning
Monitoring and measurement
Control of non-conforming product
Analysis of data
Improvement
The management system requirements under these clauses are specified in more detail in the ISO 9001 Standard.
Setting up a QMS
For organisations to function effectively, they have to identify and manage numerous interlinked, cross-functional processes, always ensuring customer satisfaction is the target that is achieved. The schematic illustrates this concept:
The adoption of a QMS needs to be a strategic decision of an organisation, and is influenced by varying needs, objectives, the products/services provided, the processes employed and the size and structure of the organisation. A QMS must ensure that the products/services conform to customer needs and expectations, and the objectives of the organisation. Issues to be considered when setting up a QMS include its:
· Design
· Build
· Control
· Deployment
· Measurement
· Review
· Improvement
Taking each of these in turn:
Design and build includes the structure of the quality management system, the process and its implementation. It’s design must be led by senior managers to suit the needs of the organisation, and this is ideally done using a framework to lead the thinking. Design of the QMS should come from determining the organisation’s core processes and well-defined goals and strategies, and be linked to the needs of one or more stakeholders.
The process for designing and building the QMS must also be clear, with the quality function playing a key role, but involvement and buy-in to the system must also come from all other functions.
Deployment and implementation is best achieved using process packages, where each core process is broken down into sub-processes, and described by a combination of documentation, education, training, tools, systems and metrics. Electronic deployment via Intranets is increasingly being used.
Control of the QMS will depend on the size and complexity of the organisation. ISO is a site-based system, and local audits and reviews are essential even if these are supplemented by central reviews.
Local control, where possible, is effective, and good practice is found where key stakeholders are documented within the process and where the process owner is allowed to control all of the process. Ideally, process owners/operators are involved in writing procedures.
Measurement is carried out to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of each process towards attaining its objectives. It should include the contribution of the QMS to the organisation’s goals; this could be achieved by measuring the following
· Policy definition completeness
· Coverage of business
· Reflection of policies
· Deployment
· Usage
· Whether staff find the QMS helpful in their work
· Speed of change of the QMS
· Relevance of QMS architecture to the job in hand
A form of scorecard deployed through the organisation down to individual objective level can be employed, and the setting of targets at all levels is vital.
Review of the effectiveness, efficiency and capability of a QMS is vital, and the outcome of these reviews should be communicated to all employees. Reviewing and monitoring should be conducted whether or not improvement activities have achieved their expected outcomes.
Improvement should follow as a result of the review process, with the aim of seeking internal best practice. It is part of the overall improvement activities and an integral part of managing change within the organisation.
ISO 9000 contains eight quality management principles, upon which to base an efficient, effective and adaptable QMS. They are applicable throughout industry, commerce and the service sectors:
· Customer focus
· Leadership
· Involving people
· Process approach
· Systems approach
· Continual improvement
· Factual decision making
· Mutually beneficial supplier relationships
Taking each one in turn, they are explained more fully as:
An effective QMS must ensure that the organisation has a strong Customer Focus. Customer needs and expectations must be determined and converted into product requirements.
Top management have to demonstrate Leadership. Providing unity of purpose through an appropriate quality policy, ensuring that measurable objectives are established, and demonstrating that they are fully committed to developing, sustaining and improving the QMS.
Managers must ensure that there is Involvement of People at all levels in the organisation. This includes ensuring that there is an awareness of the importance of meeting customer requirements and responsibilities in doing this, and people are competent, on the basis of appropriate training and experience.
An effective QMS must be a strategic tool designed to deliver business objectives, and must have, at its core, a Process Approach, with each process transforming one or more inputs to create an output of value to the customer. The key business processes may be supported by procedures and work instructions in those cases where it is judged necessary to rigidly define what rules are to be followed when undertaking a task. Most organisations will have core business processes that define those activities that directly add value to the product or service for the external customer, and supporting processes that are required to maintain the effectiveness of the core processes.
The understanding of the many interrelationships between these processes demands that a Systems Approach to management is adopted. System approach basically depend upon the different companies that which kind of QMS they are adopted in which how management approach certain things. The processes must be thoroughly understood and managed so that the most efficient use is made of available resources, to ensure that the needs of all the stakeholders – customers, employees, shareholders and the community – are met.
Customer satisfaction is a constantly moving entity depending on changes in technology and the market place, so an effective QMS must be in a state of Continuous Improvement. For this to be achieved, attention needs to be given to both the voice of the customer – through complaint analysis, opinion surveys and regular contacts – and the voice of the processes – through measurement, monitoring and analysis of both process and product data. This will result in Factual Decision Making.
Each organisation is itself only a link in the chain of a larger raw material process, and for the long term needs of the community and the organisation there needs to be Mutually Beneficial Supplier Relationships. Audits, reviews and assessments.
A good QMS will not function or improve without adequate audits and reviews.
Audits are carried out to ensure that actual methods are adhering to the documented procedures, whilst system reviews should be carried out periodically and systematically, to ensure the system achieves the required effect.
There should be a schedule for carrying out audits, with different activities possibly requiring different frequencies. An audit should not be conducted just with the aim of revealing defects or irregularities – they are for establishing the facts rather than finding faults. Audits do indicate necessary improvement and corrective actions, but must also determine if processes are effective and that responsibilities have been correctly assigned. The emphasis on process improvement and enhancing customer satisfaction in the revised standard will require a more thoughtful approach to auditing.
The generic steps involved in ISO 9000 are:
· Initiation
Scope
Frequency
· Preparation
Review of documentation
The Programme
Working documents
· Execution
Opening meeting
Examination and evaluation
Collecting evidence
Observations
Close the meeting with the auditee
· Report
Preparation
Content
Distribution
· Completion
Report
Submission
Retention
A quality management system review should take place, possibly once a year, which should cover:
· Results of audits
· Customer feedback
· Process and product conformity
· Status of preventative and corrective actions
· Follow up actions from previous management reviews
· Changes that could effect the QMS
· Recommendations for improvements
Outputs should include:
· Improvements to the QMS and processes
· Improvements of a product related to customer requirements
· Resource needs
In addition, the procedures for conducting audits and reviews and the results from them should be documented, and also be subject to review. Internal system audits and reviews should be positive and conducted as part of the preventative strategy, and not as a matter of expediency resulting from problems.
The assessment of a quality system against a standard or set of requirements by internal audit and review is known as a first-party assessment or approval scheme. If an external customer makes the assessment of a supplier, against either its own, or a national or international, standard, a second-party scheme is in operation. The assessment by an independent organisation, not connected with any contract between the customer and supplier, but acceptable to them both, is an independent third-party assessment scheme.
The latter usually results in some form of certification or registration by the assessment body.
For third-party certification schemes to be of value they need to be backed by accreditation. In the U.K., the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) is recognised by the Government as the sole national accreditation body for this purpose. UKAS accredits certification bodies by evaluating their competence against international standards.
An advantage of third-party certification, when backed by accreditation, is the assurance that it provides to customers that obviates the requirements for their own detailed checks but in addition it enables the certified organization to use the renowned national accreditation mark to denote this assurance, thus improving its competitiveness. Companies using the accredited certification bodies can also be included in the Stationery Office’s publication which lists quality assured companies, the QA Register.
All managers, not just the staff in the “quality department”, need to be fully committed to operating an effective quality management system for all the people within the organisation. The system must be planned to be effective and achieve its objectives in an uncomplicated way. It should also not be static, but be flexible, to enable constant seeking of improvements.
3.2.3 The Deming Prize
The Deming Prize is Japan’s national quality award for industry. It was established in 1951 by the Japanese Union of Scientists and engineers (JUSE) and it was named after W. Edwards Deming. He brought statistical quality control methodology to Japan after W.W.II. The Deming Prize is the world’s oldest and most prestigious of such awards. Its principles are a national competition to seek out and commend those organizations making the greatest strides each year in quality, or more specifically, TQC. The prize has three award categories. They are Individual person, the Deming Application Prizes, and the Quality Control Award for factory. The Deming Application prizes are awarded to private or public organizations and are subdivided into small enterprises, divisions of large corporations, and overseas companies. There are 143 companies who won the prize. Among them, only once has the Deming Prize been awarded to a non-Japanese company: Florida Power and Light in 1989.
Sue Rohana and David Luthy(2001) published a report which explain the check list of Deming Award, Baldrige Award and comparison between Deming and Baldridge Award.
Check list for Deming Award
Item |
Particulars |
Item |
Particulars |
1. Policy |
1. Policies pursued for management quality, and quality control. 2. Method of establishing policies. 3. Justifiability and consistency of policies. 4. Utilization of statistical methods. 5. Transmission and diffusion of policies. 6. Review of policies and the results achieved. 7. Relationship between policies and long- and short-term planning. |
6. Standardization |
1. Systematization of standards. 2. Method of establishing, revising, and abolishing standards. 3. Outcome of the establishment, revision, or abolition of standards. 4. Contents of the standards. 5. Utilization of statistical methods. 6. Accumulation of technology. 7. Utilization of standards. |
2. Organization and its Management |
1. Explicitness of the scopes of authority and responsibility 2. Appropriateness of delegations of authority 3. Interdivisional cooperation 4. Committees and their activities 5. Utilization of staff 6. Utilization of QC Circle activities 7. Quality control diagnosis |
7. Control |
1. Systems for the control of quality and such related matters as cost and quantity 2. Control items and control points 3. Utilization of such statistical control methods as control charts and other statistical concepts 4. Contribution to performance of QC circle activities 5. Actual conditions of control activities 6. State of maters under control |
3. Education and Dissemination |
1. Education programs and results 2. Quality- and control-consciousness, degrees of understanding of quality control 3. Teaching of statistical concepts and methods, and the extent of their dissemination 4. Grasp of the effectiveness of quality control 5. Education of related company (particularly those in the same group, sub-contractors, consigness, and distributers) 6. QC circle activities 7. System of suggesting ways of improvements and its actual conditions |
8. Quality Assurance |
1. Procedure for the development of new products and services (analysis and upgrading of quality, checking of design, reliability, and other properties) 2. Safety and immunity from product liability 3. Customer satisfaction 4. Process design, process analysis, and process control and improvement 5. Process capability 6. Instrumentation, gauging, testing, and inspecting 7. Equipment maintenance, and control of subcontracting, purchasing, and services 8. Quality assurance system and its audit 9. Utilization of statistical methods 10. Evaluation and audit of quality 11. Actual state of quality assurance |
4. Collection, Dissemination and Use of Information of Quality |
1. Collection of external information 2. Transmission of information between divisions 3. Speed of information transmission (use of computers) 4. 4. Data processing statistical analysis of information and utilization of the results |
9. Results |
1. Measurements of results 2. Substantive results in quality, services, delivery time, cost, profits, safety, environments, etc. 3. Intangible results 4. Measures for overcoming defects |
5. Analysis |
1. Selection of key problems and themes 2. Propriety of the analytical approach 3. Utilization of statistical methods 4. Linkage with proper technology 5. Quality analysis, process analysis 6. Utilization of analytical results 7. Assertiveness of improvement suggestions |
10. Planning for the Future |
1. Grasp of the present state of affairs and the concreteness of the plan 2. Measures for overcoming defects 3. Plans for further advances 4. Linkage with the long-term plans |
3.2.4 Baldrige Award
The Baldrige Award was established in 1987 to promote quality awareness, understand the requirements for quality excellence, and share information about successful quality strategies and benefits. There are three eligibility categories: manufacturing, services, and small firms. Unlike the Deming Prize, public or not-for-profit organizations are not qualified. Also, there is no category in which all applicants that satisfy a given level of performance receive a quality prize. Since its foundation, there are only five companies who received this prize. According to its principles, the role of quality data collection and analysis as the basis for managerial decisions is paramount. Furthermore, quality efforts should not concentrate only on the elimination of defects but also encompass creative activities that will influence customer satisfaction. Among Baldrige winners, there are no service companies.
Check list for Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award
Maximum score |
Percentage of sub-total |
1.0 Leadership 150 1.1 Leadership of top-ranking managers 50 1.2 Policy 30 1.3 Management control system and quality improvement process 30 1.4 Allocation and utilization of resources 20 1.5 Responsibility to society 10 1.6 Unique and creative leadership technique 10 |
15% |
2.0 Information and analysis 75 2.1 Utilization of analysis technique or system 15 2.2 utilization of information about product quality and servicing quality 10 2.3 Customer data and analysis 20 2.4 Analysis of quality and data of subcontractor 10 2.5 Analysis of quality and data of distributor or sales agent 10 2.6 Employee-related data and analysis 5 2.7 Unique and innovative analysis of information 5 |
7.5% |
3.0 Quality of strategy planning 75 3.1 Operation target and strategy target 20 3.2 Function of planning 20 3.3 Quality improvement plan 30 3.4 Unique and innovative planning for strategy 5 |
7.5% |
4.0 Utilization of human resources 150 4.1 Control and operation 30 4.2 Quality-consciousness and participation of employees 50 4.3 Training and education concerning quality 30 4.4 Personnel assessment, motivation, award system 30 4.5 Unique and innovative strategy concerning utilization of human resource 10 |
15% |
5.0 Quality assurance of product and servicing 150 5.1 Reflection of customer’s opinion on product and servicing 20 5.2 Development of new product and new servicing 20 5.3 Design of new product and new servicing 30 5.4 measurement, standardization, data system 10 5.5 Engineering 10 5.6 Audit 15 5.7 Recording 10 5.8 Safety, health and sanitation, environment 10 5.9 Assurance/effectiveness 15 5.10 Unique and innovative approach to quality assurance of product and servicing 10 |
15% |
6.0 Result of quality assurance of product and servicing 100 6.1 Reliability and achievement of product and servicing 25 6.2 Reduction of scrap, rework, rejection concerning product and servicing 20 6.3 Reduction of complaint and claim suit concerning quality 25 6.4 Reduction of assurance- or site-related assistance operation 20 6.5 Innovative index and economic gain for quality improvement 10 |
10% |
7.0 Customer satisfaction 300 7.1 Quality of product and servicing from customer’s viewpoint 100 7.2 Comparison of competitiveness of product and servicing 50 7.3 Customer servicing and countermeasure for complaint 75 7.4 Assurance from customer’s viewpoint 50 7.5 Unique (or innovative) technique to grasp customer satisfaction 25 |
30% |
Total 1000 |
100% |
COMPARISON OF DEMING AND BALDRIGE
If we go trough both awards procedures, there are few points which are critical in both which are followings
· A plan to keep improving all operations continuously
· A system for measuring these improvements accurately
· A strategic plan based on benchmarks that compare the company’s performance with the world’s best
· A close partnership with suppliers and customers that feeds improvements back into operations
· A deep understanding of the customers so that their wants can be translated into products
· A long-lasting relationship with customers, going beyond the delivery of the product to include sales, service, and ease of maintenance
· A focus on preventing mistakes rather than merely correcting them
· A commitment to improving quality that runs from the top of the organization to the bottom
Topic |
Baldrige Award |
Deming Prize |
---|---|---|
Definition of Quality |
“customer-driven quality” it views quality as defined by the customer |
“conformance to specifications” it views quality as defined by the producers |
Primary Focus |
Customer satisfaction and quality |
statistical quality control |
Overall Approach |
quality of management |
management of quality |
Purpose |
promote competitiveness through total quality management |
promote quality assurance through statistical techniques |
Types of Organization |
manufacturing, service and small business |
essentially private or public manufacturing |
Orientation |
60% result, 40% process |
60% process, 40% results |
Scoring Weight |
Different weight for each criteria |
equal weight in 10 criteria |
Consideration |
Less concern |
concern in productivity, delivery, safety, and environment |
Information Management |
heavily concern |
less concern |
Continuous of the award |
N/A |
Japan Quality Control Medal |
Winners |
Maximum of two per category |
All firms meeting standard |
Scope |
U.S. firms only |
Firms for any country |
Applications |
$2500 and 75 pages packet |
1000 pages and one year working with consultant from the union of Japanese Scientist & Engineers |
Grading time |
Six months |
one year |
First Award |
1987 |
1951 |
Sponsor |
National Institutes Standards and Technology |
Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers |
Grading Criteria |
1. Leadership * of top-ranking managers * policy * management control system & quality improvement process * allocation and utilization of resources * responsibility to society * unique and creative leadership technique 2. Information and Analysis * utilization of analysis technique or system * utilization of information about product quality and servicing quality * customer data and analysis * analysis of quality and data of subcontractor and distributor or sales agent 3. Quality of Strategy Planning * operation target and strategy target * function of planning * quality improvement plan * unique and innovative planning for strategy 4. Utilization of Human Resource * control and operation * quality consciousness and participation of employees * training and education concerning quality * personnel assessment, motivation, award system * innovative strategy concerning utilization of human resource 5. Quality Assurance of Product and Servicing * reflection of customer’s opinion on product and servicing * design and development of new product and new servicing * measurement, standardization, data system * engineering, audit, recording * safety, health and sanitation, ,environment * approach to quality assurance of product and servicing 6. Result of Quality Assurance of Product and Servicing * reliability and achievement of product and servicing * reduction of scrap, rework, rejection, concerning product and servicing * reduction of complaint and claim suit concerning quality * innovative index and economic gain for quality improvement 7. Customer Satisfaction * quality of product and servicing from customer’s viewpoint * comparison of competitiveness of product and servicing * customer servicing and countermeasure for complaint * assurance from customer’s viewpoint * technique to grasp customer satisfaction |
1. Policy and Objectives * pursued for management quality & QC * method of establishing quality * justifiability and consistency of policies * review of policies and the result achieved * relationship between policies and long term & short term planning 2. Organization and its Management * explicitness of the scopes of authority and responsibility * interdivisional cooperation * committees and their activities * utilization of staff * utilization of QC Circle activities * QC diagnosis 3. Education and dissemination * education program and results * degrees of understanding of QC * teaching of statistical concepts and methods * grasp of the effectiveness of QC * QC circle activities * system of suggesting ways of improvements and its actual conditions 4. Collection, Dissemination and Use of Information on Quality * collection of external information * transmission of information between divisions * speed of information transmission * data processing, statistical analysis of information and utilization of the results 5. Analysis * selection of key problems and themes * propriety of the analytical approach * utilization of statistical methods * linkage with proper technology * quality analysis, process analysis * utilization of analytical results * assertiveness of improvement suggestions 6. Standardization * systematization of standards * method of establishing, revising, and abolishing standards and their outcome * utilization of statistical methods * contents of the standards * accumulation of technology * utilization of standards 7. Control * system for the control of quality and related matters * control items and control points * utilization of such statistical control methods as control charts and other statistical concepts * contribution to performance of QC circle * actual conditions of control activities 8. Quality Assurance * procedure for the development of new products and services * safety and immunity from product liability * customer satisfaction * process design, analysis, control and improvement * process capability * instrumentation, gauging, testing and inspecting * equipment maintenance and control of subcontracting, purchasing, and services 9. Results * measurement of results * substantive results in quality, services, delivery time, cost, profits, safety environments * intangible results * measures for overcoming defects 10. Planning for the Future * grasp of the present state of affairs and the concreteness of the plan * measures for overcoming defects * plans for further advances * linkage with the long term plans |
3.3 ISO 9000 IN PHARMACEUTICAL
Increased safety in drug administration and continuous monitoring of the quality of clinical and research process is necessary in medical oncology, but to our knowledge no medical oncology unit in Europe has yet planned or achieved certification .In Europe the quality accretion systems is mainly provided through ISO 9001/2000 VISION.
Pharmaceutical manufacturers have the responsibility of developing safe production through the proper selection of ingredients, product formulation add safety substantiation. They are also responsible for the quality of the raw materials they purchase .In the current climate, understanding only raw material science will not be enough .Suppliers will need to integrate environment impact with the pharmaceutical industry in order to build the proper level of controls into their manufacturing and distribution practices
These trends become increasingly important as pharmaceutical companies require improved Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) expectations from their suppliers due to greater regulatory demand for safe products throughout the entire supply chain. Price pressures from competition and cheap sources of material of questionable quality also need to be considered.
While going trough the literature the writer learn that in the drug manufacturing, there are 2 types on ingredients involve, One which is active and one which in non active. The active ingredients are those which are according to formula of the drug. The other which are non active are excipients.
The writer is going to use excipients as an example because it is a commodity market and also these are bought in from market as raw material.
The pharmaceutical industry is ever thirsty to satisfy patient’s therapeutical needs and apart from active ingredients, inactive excipients play a major role in formulation development. Pharmaceutical excipients are substances other than the pharmacologically active drug or prodrug which are included in the manufacturing process or are contained in a finished pharmaceutical product dosage form.
In addition to transporting the active drug to the site in the body where the drug is intended to exert its action, excipients play an important part in the manufacturing process. They may also be important for keeping the drug from being released too early in the assimilation process in places where it could damage tender tissue and create gastric irritation or stomach upset
Lot of time and effort are still needed in field of excipients. However till then a formulation scientist is entrusted with the limited amount of excipients.
Pharmaceutical excipients(Pharmaceutical excipients are substances – other than the active pharmaceutical ingredient – that are used in the finished dosage form.) inactive ingredients that when combined with active pharmaceutical ingredients ,produce a drug dosage from typically make up about 99% of a finished drug product .These excipients are derived from various sources (natural ,biological and chemical etc) and can be targeted for use in variety of products intended for very diverse business .Their role in pharmaceutical products can be vary from non critical to highly sophisticated ,depending on the drug and dosage from design.
Today most countries worldwide have requirements for reviewing and approving pharmaceutical products, or are currently working to establish them in order to ensure product quality ,safety and traceability, however current legislation are targeted mainly at regulating compliance for APIs
Currently, control of excipient manufacturing and distribution is not a key priority for regulatory authorities or pharmaceutical manufacturers, perhaps due to the fact that most of these excipients originated from the food industry and have Generally Recognised As Safe (GRAS) status .However, with the emergence of excipients and delivery systems, better control of these materials becomes increasingly important.
In general excipients have not been a major source of concern. However , even today examples exist where identified issues may been minimised or eliminated using better control of the essential elements of GMPs.
For example near 100 deaths resulted from cough syrup that was contaminated with diethylene glycol according to the World Health Organization WHO.
The current trend is to use risk management as foundation for defining the appropriate level of GMPS. Caution should be taken when using these tools since they involve a complete understanding of the end -use applications.
This situation becomes much more complex when distributors and brokers are involved.
Defining a standard that would be applicable universally to all types of excipients may be impossible . However an effort to assist the pharmaceutical manufacturers in developing a set of GMP guidelines targeted at excipients ,both the international PHARMCEUTICAL Excipients council and WHO have published GMP guidelines for bulk pharmaceutical excipients. These guidelines target understanding and implementing the key principles of GMPs such as
· Documentation and traceability
· Change control and customer notification
· Contamination control
Addressing these needs in an affordable manner is just as important as delivering the critical principles noted .Thus, a balanced approach must be used when establishing key GMP rules.
Because of the diverse nature of excipients, it is expected the the foundation for the excipients industry would be based on International Organization for Standardization (ISO) quality standards.Although ISO standard guidelines provide a valuable framework for quality systems ,they focus mainly on the what rather than the how Quality improvements are seen in the excipients industry as way of life ,however those improvements may lead to changes that might have an impact on downstream products and delivery systems .Suppliers of raw materials and components of drug manufacturer would receive ,including a mechanism to notify pharmaceutical manufacturers of significant change .
3.4 Methods of developing ISO 9000 in pharmaceutical Or Integrating GMP into ISO
Because the pharmaceutical industry has traditionally focused upon the application of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), it has been slow to consider the potential benefits to be gained by implementing an EN ISO 9001 Quality Management System (QMS).
Over the last few years the global pharmaceutical market has undergone significant change, forcing pharmaceutical companies, more than ever before, to focus on customer needs and upon their own internal efficiency in order to continue to compete effectively.
With this in mind CEFIC commissioned a working group of experts drawn from several major Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) producers to prepare a practical, user-friendly guidance document integrating current GMP requirements into the EN-ISO 9001 QMS framework. To achieve this the working group have taken relevant features from the August 1996 CEFIC/EFPIA publication “Good Manufacturing Practice for Active Ingredients Manufacturers” and combined these with the relevant complementary requirements of EN-ISO 9001 “Quality Systems: Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing”. It is intended that these Guidelines are applicable to all APIs.
However, in the case of a sterile API , the Guidelines should be applied at least to the point at which the API enters a sterilising process.
To facilitate understanding of this composite guidance document it is important for the reader to be aware of the following points:
3.4.1 Difference Between ISO and GMP
· EN-ISO 9001 is a generic, business focused, standard which supports the effective management of quality to an internationally recognised level of best practice. It is flexible in that it specifies what is to be achieved, but allows each company freedom to determine, and justify, how these requirements are achieved. In contrast, GMP is an industry-specific standard prescribing what must be done to ensure product safety and efficacy. Thus, EN-ISO 9001 benefits the business by ensuring the quality of the management system, while GMP ensures that regulatory requirements are met.
· Although there is inevitably some overlap between the requirements of a QMS and GMP they are, in fact, highly complementary. This view is supported by a statement in the introduction to the PIC (International Inspection Convention) GMP Guideline which refers to “……. a correctly implemented system of Quality Assurance incorporating GMP …….”, and by the wording of the introduction in ISO itself which points out that “……. this international standard is complementary – not alternative – to the technical (product) specified requirements”.
To be effective the QMS should have the visible and ongoing support of top management.
To fully benefit the company the QMS should involve all staff whose activities influence quality, have a clear and unambiguous continuous improvement focus, and incorporate relevant, realistic performance measures with emphasis on reducing failure costs, and satisfying (internal and external) customer needs.
The quality manual occupies the highest level in the document hierarchy. It overviews and acts as a directory to the QMS, capturing the unique character of the company.
An effective QMS has a minimum of paperwork, and should constantly question the need for the existing documents. In contrast, a bureaucratic and inefficient QMS will arise if the Standard is misinterpreted, and incorrectly applied.
In document(EN-ISO 9001), the original EN-ISO 9001 subclauses have been addressed in twenty distinct chapters supplemented by four annexes in recognition of the importance of issues concerning hygiene; facilities and utilities; validation; and change control, to the API industry. Each chapter and each of the four annexes are structured in a way which summarises the appropriate QMS principle and philosophy as a preface to the main text which integrates relevant GMP requirements and QMS principles. The rationale/justification and business benefits of a combined QMS/GMP approach are considered Safety, health and environment are not specifically addressed. However, it is widely acknowledged that implementation of a robust QMS provides a sound basis for the future development of such an Integrated Management System.
“In EN-ISO 9001 the term “should” indicates requirements that are expected to apply unless shown to be inapplicable or replaced by an alternative demonstrated to provide at least an equivalent level of quality assurance.”
Chapter 4
4.1 Previous Work of ISO 9000 in Pharmaceutical
Since people began working with formal routines and Quality Management Systems, there have been efforts trying to observe how these are used in the everyday work. One would believe that the widespread use of web based tools may have increased the usage of such systems, since information now is a lot more available in the work situation. One could also believe that the stronger competition for market shares in the pharmaceutical industry would lead to the need of formal routines to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the companies. This section will look at some of the previous work done in this field.
4.2 Formal Routines for Quality in Pharmaceutical
Before the start usage of ISO 9000 in pharmaceutical, most of the companies use the GMP (Good manufacturing practices).
The ICH Q10(International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requi
Order Now